tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post8923958915411810008..comments2024-02-28T15:35:41.753-05:00Comments on JFK Files: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy – 48 Years OnDale K. Myershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17079679710654429737noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-65427041491301759022013-08-15T17:09:56.178-04:002013-08-15T17:09:56.178-04:00An excellent article. The more you read about the ...An excellent article. The more you read about the assassination the more fascinating it becomes. The indirect connection between jackie and oswald would seem preposterous if it were fictional. kevinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13329091158911547303noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-58445822741918265182012-03-19T16:01:30.883-04:002012-03-19T16:01:30.883-04:00Patrick,
I suppose it is theoretically possible t...Patrick,<br /><br />I suppose it is theoretically possible that Oswald was both guilty and part of a conspiracy. But while the evidence for Oswald’s guilt is overwhelming, the evidence for him being part of a conspiracy is practically non existent.<br /><br />If it is accepted that Oswald is guilty – and it is difficult to come to any other conclusion – the evidence for conspiracy must relate to John Martinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-60155479671683067432012-03-18T23:27:59.864-04:002012-03-18T23:27:59.864-04:00Could Oswald not have been both guilty AND a part ...Could Oswald not have been both guilty AND a part of a conspiracy? Just because he fired the fatal shots does not necessarily mean he acted alone.<br /><br /> The only FACT I have seen regarding the JFK assassination is that much of the "evidence" has been tampered with to some degree. <br /><br />This does not mean that there was definitely a conspiracy, it just means that the evidencePatricknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-30444353660905817292012-03-09T17:52:43.142-05:002012-03-09T17:52:43.142-05:00Thank you for your comment, Neal.
You seem to bel...Thank you for your comment, Neal.<br /><br />You seem to believe that the truth necessarily lies somewhere between two “extreme views”. I disagree. Either Lee Harvey Oswald killed President Kennedy (and Tippit) or he did not. Either there was a conspiracy or there was not. The correctness of either position stands or falls on the evidence.<br /><br />Of course, it is possible to take an agnosticJohn Martinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-27362851824554027482012-02-17T17:01:10.934-05:002012-02-17T17:01:10.934-05:00Such a shame.
Another intelligent journalist take...Such a shame.<br /><br />Another intelligent journalist taken in by the "official" story, and apparently there is not a shred of doubt. <br /><br />Whilst I agree there are some pretty wacky conspiracy theories, there are undoubtedly questions that still need answering.<br /><br />It is depressing and frustrating that both the conspiracy theorists and Warren Commission supporters feel Nealnoreply@blogger.com