tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post4072260829325942556..comments2024-02-28T15:35:41.753-05:00Comments on JFK Files: The Dallas-Cuba Connection - 2009 UpdateDale K. Myershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17079679710654429737noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-87720458012279333612018-01-13T08:43:48.609-05:002018-01-13T08:43:48.609-05:00I don't know who changed my name in the before...<br /><br />I don't know who changed my name in the before post. My name is Ed Prida, no Mucho. I identified the Havana's Cuban Boys in Dallas, on November 22, 1963 at 12:29 pm. also some of them, where they were living, pictures when they are watching how their puppet Oswald shooted JFK, etc. The CIA's files had been opened from 1999.<br />The researchers did not know their names orEd Pridanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-39207581784039688372014-07-23T21:15:16.951-04:002014-07-23T21:15:16.951-04:00When the Britannia landed in Cuba on November 27, ...When the Britannia landed in Cuba on November 27, 1963 I knew, Fabian Escalante was involved in anyway in JFK's case, but at this time he also had 23 years old and he is son of old communist Cesar Escalante, with 23 years old he is not significative character at this time.<br />I don't understand the researcher never paid attention to another very important first KGB's Masterspy Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-57158499725710417102011-11-11T05:25:22.769-05:002011-11-11T05:25:22.769-05:00Oh, what a tangled web we weave
When first we prac...Oh, what a tangled web we weave<br />When first we practise to deceive.Michael Parisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-91378270247567254622010-01-19T16:32:06.575-05:002010-01-19T16:32:06.575-05:00In the last week I happened to browse through the ...In the last week I happened to browse through the Warren Commission on the internet. Some of the witness statements are very interesting. In particular I was fascinated by the statements of George de Mohrenschildt, his wife Jeanne and Igor Voshinin. These clear up some of the puzzlement I had about Oswald. <br /><br />In my post above (August 14th, 2009) I expressed my surprise at the level of John M.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-35263704763218226522009-08-17T12:53:02.094-04:002009-08-17T12:53:02.094-04:00In response to Paul May: To restate what I wrote i...In response to Paul May: To restate what I wrote in an earlier response, the fact that CIA is withholding DRE and Joannides files DOES NOT PER SE equate to withholding assassination records. There are a myriad of other possible reasons for the denials. In the Escalante case, CIA ADMITS the files are related in some way to the case. That is vastly different.<br />Re Harker: I spent much time withGus Russohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11695231345447309768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-22572150170650509592009-08-17T00:49:49.967-04:002009-08-17T00:49:49.967-04:00To believe the CIA is not holding files on the eve...To believe the CIA is not holding files on the events of 11/22/63 and prior is naive. They have disregarded court orders regarding the DRE and George Joannides as an example. I for one have always believed the Harker interview to have been the genesis for Oswalds events. Jim DiEugenio has said per UPI, Castro never made the comment attributed to him. Gus? I tried to email you to ask your Paul Maynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-7532729796309381622009-08-15T09:42:19.694-04:002009-08-15T09:42:19.694-04:00>>>"But clearly, based on the result...>>>"But clearly, based on the results of Mr. Russo's FOIA request, there are some assassination related records (some that have previously been unknown) that are being withheld, yes?"<<<<br /><br />Beats me.David Von Peinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12501570830179992520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-10604126214968650112009-08-15T09:38:15.558-04:002009-08-15T09:38:15.558-04:00DVP, you apparently missed the point of the articl...DVP, you apparently missed the point of the article above - Mr. Russo's FOIA request shows that the CIA <i>has been withholding assassination related documents</i>.<br /><br />Mr. Bugliosi's comment that virtually all of the assassination records have already been released refers to <i>known</i> records. Which is not to say that millions of pages remain classified or hidden. I agree with Dale K. Myershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17079679710654429737noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-37626527872844249802009-08-15T00:58:03.857-04:002009-08-15T00:58:03.857-04:00>>>"Unless and until the files of th...>>>"Unless and until the files of the Mexico City Police, Cuban Intelligence, KGB, and CIA on Oswald's Mexico City trip are released in full..."<<<<br /><br />So, Dale, you must think that Vincent Bugliosi (who studied the case for over 20 years before publishing his book "Reclaiming History") is dead wrong when he insists that virtually all of the "David Von Peinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12501570830179992520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-16268135463336426902009-08-14T15:36:17.265-04:002009-08-14T15:36:17.265-04:00Good question. The CIA initially claimed that they...Good question. The CIA initially claimed that they only learned of Oswald's visit to the Cuban embassy after the assassination. In fact, they knew he had been there at the time it happened. Why did they withhold this information? The answer may never be fully known.<br /><br />It could be because they were embarrassed that the surveillance on Oswald fell through the cracks; or it could be Dale K. Myershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17079679710654429737noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-82040748351997726472009-08-14T12:50:29.479-04:002009-08-14T12:50:29.479-04:00I haven’t read Gus’s book either, but his theory –...I haven’t read Gus’s book either, but his theory – as Dale describes it – sounds plausible.<br /><br />My own belief is that the CIA knew far more about Oswald than it would like to admit. It is possible that both the Cubans and the CIA were fishing in troubled waters. They were both aware that Oswald was unstable and violent and were wondering how he could be manipulated for their own ends. <br John M.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-56282048519116080752009-08-14T12:45:39.211-04:002009-08-14T12:45:39.211-04:00Ouch! Mr. Myers it really hurts when you compare m...Ouch! Mr. Myers it really hurts when you compare me to the conspiracy crowd, especially since your friend Mr. Russo is the one proposing a conspiracy here. <br /><br />The book concluded that Oswald’s own idea to shoot Kennedy was encouraged by Cubans he met in Mexico, so it sounds as though a conspiracy came into existence in September, 1963. Then Oswald wasted no time in getting a job in the J. Raymond Carrollhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14583545340365470976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-11757192948027587282009-08-14T09:51:49.366-04:002009-08-14T09:51:49.366-04:00Obviously, you haven't read Gus Russo and Step...Obviously, you haven't read Gus Russo and Stephen Molton's book. Your overreaction is typical of the conspiracy crowd.<br /><br />The book didn't conclude that the Castro government <i>hired</i> Oswald. The book concluded that<br />Oswald's own idea to shoot Kennedy was encouraged by Cubans he met in Mexico City. One of them <i>may have been</i> Fabian Escalante, but that has yet Dale K. Myershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17079679710654429737noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-12071593092732178982009-08-14T08:14:51.502-04:002009-08-14T08:14:51.502-04:00If Castro's government was behind the assassin...If Castro's government was behind the assassination, as Mr. Russo seems to think, and if the CIA is covering up Castro's involvement, as his article here suggests, then the CIA must be a nest of TREASON. <br /><br />That would be BIG news indeed, if it were true. It would mean that our system of government has already ceased to function, and is now a mere charade.J. Raymond Carrollhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14583545340365470976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-18537675273546944782009-08-13T11:18:09.182-04:002009-08-13T11:18:09.182-04:00Mr. Carroll couldn't be being sarcastic, could...Mr. Carroll couldn't be being sarcastic, could he? Not on the internet? What's next, Matt Drudge slamming Obama?<br />I realize that nuance is largely a stranger to the web crowd, so let me try to state this VERY clearly:<br />Jeff Morley BELIEVES the CIA is withholding assassination related documents, and he readily admits the Joannides material MAY have nothing to do with JFK. And he Gus Russohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11695231345447309768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-740402724246726837.post-6007905327792354582009-08-12T20:35:40.352-04:002009-08-12T20:35:40.352-04:00"In summary, we now know: 1) the CIA is withh..."In summary, we now know: 1) the CIA is withholding assassination related records"<br /><br />This is BIG news. Wait till I tell Jefferson Morley.J. Raymond Carrollhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14583545340365470976noreply@blogger.com